如果加拿大的醫(yī)療保健不是免費(fèi)的，而且質(zhì)量較低，那么它究竟在哪里更好呢？

Vince Jacobs
First, where do you get the idea that Canadian healthcare is of lower quality than American healthcare, Fox???? Yeah, probably, as only a Fox / MAGA viewer would say something as ignorant as that. Just try being poor in the US versus poor in Canada. Trump has just this week taken away medicaid from the most vulnerable people - guess you voted for that, right? america is the only country in the developed world where life expectancy is falling! Great heah?
Is Canadian healthcare free? No. We pay for it out of taxation, the same way Americans pay for their military. Our taxes save lives, your taxes kill people.
 
首先，你從哪里得出加拿大醫(yī)療比美國(guó)低質(zhì)量的結(jié)論，F(xiàn)ox？？對(duì)吧，只有像Fox/MAGA的觀眾才會(huì)說(shuō)出這種無(wú)知的話。試著比較一下在美國(guó)貧窮和在加拿大貧窮的感受。特朗普這周剛剛剝奪了最脆弱群體的醫(yī)療補(bǔ)助——你是不是投票支持他的？美國(guó)是唯一一個(gè)在發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家中預(yù)期壽命在下降的國(guó)家！太棒了，是吧？
加拿大的醫(yī)療是免費(fèi)的么？不是的。我們通過(guò)稅收來(lái)支付，就像美國(guó)人支付軍事開支一樣。我們的稅收救人命，你們的稅收害人命。
 
Kathy Lascar
Health care isn’t free but is is cheaper because it is payed through our taxes and spread out over the whole population. Health care is not of lower quality, the outcomes are often superior to American outcomes. You should never think that because health care in the US is more expensive that it must be better. In the US health care is big business out to make money for its share holders.. Insurance companies do not want to insure people with medical conditions, people in dangerous jobs or the elderly. They want young healthy people only. When a young healthy person develops a serious illness the insurance company or course has to pay the bill but will do everything in their power to cancel that insurance as soon as the opportunity arises. Hospitals are built and run to make profits. Canadian health care offers more preventative care than American insurance plans. There are waiting periods for surgeries like knee replacement, hip replacement and cataract surgeries. There are some Americans that like to say people die waiting for surgery in Canada. That may have some partial truth. Generally the people who need knee replacements, hip replacements or cataract surgery are older people with other medical issues. These people may die waiting for a knee replacement but it is not their bad knee that they died from.
 
醫(yī)療不是免費(fèi)的，但它更便宜，因?yàn)樗峭ㄟ^(guò)我們的稅收支付的，而且費(fèi)用分?jǐn)偟饺w人口上。醫(yī)療質(zhì)量并不低，結(jié)果往往優(yōu)于美國(guó)。你不應(yīng)該認(rèn)為，因?yàn)槊绹?guó)的醫(yī)療更貴，它就一定更好。在美國(guó)，醫(yī)療是一個(gè)巨大的商業(yè)領(lǐng)域，目的是為股東賺取利潤(rùn)。保險(xiǎn)公司不想為有醫(yī)療條件的人、從事危險(xiǎn)工作的人員或老年人提供保險(xiǎn)。他們只想要健康的年輕人。當(dāng)一個(gè)年輕健康的人患上嚴(yán)重疾病時(shí)，保險(xiǎn)公司當(dāng)然需要支付賬單，但他們會(huì)竭盡全力在有機(jī)會(huì)時(shí)取消這個(gè)保險(xiǎn)。醫(yī)院的建設(shè)和運(yùn)營(yíng)是為了盈利。加拿大的醫(yī)療保健提供了比美國(guó)保險(xiǎn)計(jì)劃更多的預(yù)防性護(hù)理。像膝關(guān)節(jié)置換、髖關(guān)節(jié)置換和白內(nèi)障手術(shù)這樣的手術(shù)會(huì)有等待期。一些美國(guó)人喜歡說(shuō)加拿大的人因等待手術(shù)而死亡。也許這有部分事實(shí)。通常需要膝關(guān)節(jié)置換、髖關(guān)節(jié)置換或白內(nèi)障手術(shù)的人是年紀(jì)較大的且有其他健康問(wèn)題的人。這些人可能因?yàn)榈却リP(guān)節(jié)置換而去世，但不是因?yàn)樗麄兊南ドw出了問(wèn)題。
 
Rathkeale
There is NO free healthcare systems anywhere. All Canadians pay toward the cost through taxes instead of at time of service.
Canadian healthcare is of high quality. Patients and medical staff come from all over the world to be treated and to learn and contribute in Canada.
All Canadians benefit. We are healthier, live longer, and not one person has gone bankrupt as a result of medical costs.
Canadian citizens, those with Permanent Residency, and refugees are covered. Medical care is never connected to employment.
Healthy Canadians work more and pay more taxes.
I think you have been lied to.
 
任何地方都沒(méi)有免費(fèi)的醫(yī)療系統(tǒng)。所有加拿大人通過(guò)稅收為醫(yī)療費(fèi)用出資，而不是在服務(wù)時(shí)支付。
加拿大的醫(yī)療質(zhì)量很高?；颊吆歪t(yī)務(wù)人員來(lái)自世界各地，在加拿大接受治療、學(xué)習(xí)并做出貢獻(xiàn)。
所有加拿大人都受益。我們更健康，壽命更長(zhǎng)，而且沒(méi)有一個(gè)人因?yàn)獒t(yī)療費(fèi)用而破產(chǎn)。
加拿大公民、永久居民和難民都能享受醫(yī)療保障。醫(yī)療與就業(yè)沒(méi)有關(guān)聯(lián)。
健康的加拿大人工作更多，繳納更多稅收。
我覺得你被謊言蒙蔽了。
 
Rick Swartz
Neither statement is accurate.
First, no healthcare system is “free.” There’s no such thing. Anywhere. What you’re actually talking about is universal healthcare, which is usually pre-paid (usually through taxes, depending on the country).
 
這兩個(gè)說(shuō)法都不準(zhǔn)確。
首先，沒(méi)有任何醫(yī)療系統(tǒng)是“免費(fèi)的”。沒(méi)有這種東西。任何地方都沒(méi)有。你實(shí)際上在說(shuō)的是全民醫(yī)療保健，這通常是預(yù)付的（通常通過(guò)稅收支付，具體取決于國(guó)家）。
 
Canadian healthcare costs less than American healthcare because their system isn’t dominated by a largely unregulated private insurance industry that takes 10s of billions for itself that does not go to healthcare.
And Canadian healthcare is a higher quality than American, which is indicated by their medical data like lifetime expectancies. In fact compared to all nations in the developed world, US medical outcomes rank the lowest. That is because every single developed nation on earth has universal healthcare, with the sole exception of the US.
 
加拿大的醫(yī)療比美國(guó)便宜，因?yàn)樗麄兊南到y(tǒng)沒(méi)有被一個(gè)大規(guī)模不受監(jiān)管的私人保險(xiǎn)行業(yè)主導(dǎo)，而該行業(yè)將數(shù)十億資金占為己有，這些資金并未用于醫(yī)療保健。
而且加拿大的醫(yī)療質(zhì)量比美國(guó)更高，這可以通過(guò)他們的醫(yī)療數(shù)據(jù)，比如預(yù)期壽命，來(lái)證明。事實(shí)上，與所有發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家相比，美國(guó)的醫(yī)療結(jié)果排名最低。這是因?yàn)榈厍蛏厦總€(gè)發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家都有全民醫(yī)療保健，唯一的例外是美國(guó)。
 
So it’s not just Canada. Every developed nation with universal healthcare—which again is all of them except the US—have less expensive healthcare systems than the US and also produces better general medical results than the American system does.
You are caught in a little bubble of lies and misinformation. Time to wake up?
 
所以，不僅僅是加拿大。所有擁有全民醫(yī)療保健的發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家——也就是除了美國(guó)以外的所有國(guó)家——其醫(yī)療系統(tǒng)都比美國(guó)便宜，并且提供比美國(guó)系統(tǒng)更好的整體醫(yī)療結(jié)果。
你被一團(tuán)謊言和誤信息困住了。是時(shí)候清醒過(guò)來(lái)了。
 
Ken Irwin
About five weeks ago, I noticed a strange lump on my throat. After about a month, I noticed it wasn’t going away, so I went to see my doctor. He was quite concerned and ordered bloodwork and an ultrasound. I got the results about a day after the tests: NOT cancer, just a cyst. My doctor has reached out to a surgeon to have it removed, and I expect to hear from the surgeon’s office sometime in the coming week to set up a consult for surgery. None of this has cost me a dime, and it’s all been a pretty speedy process so far.
 
大約五周前，我注意到喉嚨上有個(gè)奇怪的腫塊。一個(gè)月后，我發(fā)現(xiàn)它沒(méi)有消失，所以我去看了我的醫(yī)生。他非常擔(dān)心，并安排了血液檢查和超聲波檢查。我大約在做完檢查后的一天收到了結(jié)果：不是癌癥，只是一個(gè)囊腫。我的醫(yī)生已經(jīng)聯(lián)系了一位外科醫(yī)生進(jìn)行切除手術(shù)，我預(yù)計(jì)會(huì)在下周收到外科醫(yī)生辦公室的通知，安排咨詢手術(shù)的事宜。到目前為止，這一切都沒(méi)有花費(fèi)我一分錢，而且進(jìn)展非常迅速。
 
Sounds pretty good to me…
Small upxe, MAY 31 2025: I have an appointment with a surgeon on July 09 to see about, well, surgery. And again, this won’t cost me anything ($50 if I were to cancel the appointment last minute), but other than that possibility, zilch, zero, nada. There’s even free parking in front of his office.
 
聽起來(lái)很不錯(cuò)，對(duì)吧？
小更新，2025年5月31日：我已經(jīng)在7月9日預(yù)約了外科醫(yī)生，商量手術(shù)事宜。再次強(qiáng)調(diào)，這不會(huì)花費(fèi)我任何費(fèi)用（如果我臨時(shí)取消預(yù)約，只需支付50美元），除此之外，完全沒(méi)有其他費(fèi)用。甚至他的診所前有免費(fèi)的停車位。
 
Robert Crone
Know how many people go bankrupt in Canada every year from my medical bills? Zero. US? Over 600,000.
Canadians live longer.
Infant mortality is lower in Canada.
Fewer women die in childbirth in Canada.
Abortion is an issue between a woman and her doctor. Not some bible banger governor of some hillbilly state!
Stop acting as if your country is the be all and end all. Wake up and see how badly you are getting screwed!
 
知道每年有多少人在加拿大因醫(yī)療賬單破產(chǎn)嗎？零。美國(guó)呢？超過(guò)60萬(wàn)人。
加拿大人活得更長(zhǎng)。
加拿大的嬰兒死亡率較低。
加拿大的產(chǎn)婦死亡率較低。
墮胎是女人和她的醫(yī)生之間的問(wèn)題，而不是某個(gè)偏遠(yuǎn)州的圣經(jīng)狂熱者州長(zhǎng)的問(wèn)題！
別再表現(xiàn)得好像你們的國(guó)家是唯一的答案了。醒醒吧，看看你們是如何被坑的！
 
Joan Vredik Broadley
Canadian healthcare is not free. We pay for it with our taxes; that way everyone is covered whether they could afford it or not. And we don’t have lower quality; some of the world’s cutting edge research in serious diseases and conditions are done in Canada. Many American doctors have actually moved to Canada to work. When the government funds everything, there are no “special interests” to hamper treatment, diagnosis, or pharmaceuticals.
 
加拿大的醫(yī)療并非免費(fèi)。我們通過(guò)稅收為其提供資金，這樣每個(gè)人都能得到保障，不管他們是否能負(fù)擔(dān)得起。而且我們的醫(yī)療質(zhì)量并不低，很多世界領(lǐng)先的重大疾病和病癥研究都在加拿大進(jìn)行。許多美國(guó)醫(yī)生實(shí)際上都搬到了加拿大工作。當(dāng)政府為所有醫(yī)療費(fèi)用提供資金時(shí)，就沒(méi)有“特殊利益”會(huì)妨礙治療、診斷或藥品的提供。
 
Lastsaaskpirate
Considering that we live longer than Yanks, more of our kids live to grow up than Yanks and more of our mothers survive childbirth than Yanks, as a start I’d say that overall we do much better than Americans who pay more for less healthcare.
 
考慮到我們比美國(guó)人活得更長(zhǎng)，更多的孩子能活到成年，更多的母親能在分娩時(shí)存活，我想說(shuō)，我們整體做得比那些為更差的醫(yī)療支付更多費(fèi)用的美國(guó)人要好得多。
 
Scott
When I get sick in Canada a doctor tells me what my treatment is when I get sick in the U.S. an accountant tells me what my treatment is.
 
在加拿大生病時(shí)，醫(yī)生告訴我應(yīng)該怎樣治療；在美國(guó)，財(cái)務(wù)會(huì)計(jì)告訴我應(yīng)該怎樣治療。
 
Angela Birch
It isn’t free and Canadians know how it is funded but the quality is superior as demonstrated by better maternal infant survival rates and longer life expectancy. IT i also way way way less expensive and for a better quality product.
 
這并不是免費(fèi)的，加拿大人知道它是如何資助的，但質(zhì)量卻更高，證明了更好的產(chǎn)婦和嬰兒存活率以及更長(zhǎng)的壽命。同時(shí)，它也比美國(guó)便宜得多，而且質(zhì)量更好。
 
World Orphan
Because it is not lower quality. You obviously benefit from the broken US system whose only goal is to make the insurance companies better.
A country that doesnt protect its most vulnerable, and doesnt provide affordable care for everyone, is a failed country. No matter how many billionaires it has.
 
因?yàn)樗⒉坏唾|(zhì)量。你顯然從破碎的美國(guó)系統(tǒng)中受益，而美國(guó)系統(tǒng)的唯一目標(biāo)就是讓保險(xiǎn)公司更好。
一個(gè)不保護(hù)最脆弱群體、不為每個(gè)人提供負(fù)擔(dān)得起的醫(yī)療的國(guó)家，就是一個(gè)失敗的國(guó)家。不管它有多少億萬(wàn)富翁。
 
Jeff Lee
What do you mean “isn't free?” Of course it is. You may have to pay for dental and some prescxtions but that is true for any country with universal Healthcare.
It is better because it saves the average person about $2500 to $3500 per year, and the increase in taxes for the same income is probably less than $1,000. Why is it better? Well, there are no bankruptcies for the inability to cover a $100,000 surgery, people are healthier because they are diagnosed sooner and treated sooner for the 25 chronic diseases that kill 70% mainly bec!use Americans cannot afford treatment (even if they are insured). So, there is the quality of life and longer life. Also, lower infant mortality because women do not avoid prenatal care. Also, even insured Americans are more likely to die awaiting surgery because of three weeks to see a specialist and three weeks to see the referred surgeon, and two to three weeks to schedule surgery, that is nine weeks mimimum assuming you call a specialist first. No one waits more than three to five weeks for heart, kidney, liver, or brain surgery in Canada.
 
你說(shuō)“不是免費(fèi)的”是什么意思？當(dāng)然是免費(fèi)的。你可能需要支付牙科和一些處方藥費(fèi)用，但這是任何有全民醫(yī)療保健的國(guó)家都會(huì)存在的情況。它更好，因?yàn)樗磕昴転槠胀ㄈ斯?jié)省約2500到3500美元，而相同收入的稅收增加可能不到1000美元。為什么它更好？因?yàn)闆](méi)有因?yàn)闊o(wú)法支付10萬(wàn)美元手術(shù)費(fèi)用而破產(chǎn)的人們，人們更健康，因?yàn)樗麄冊(cè)?5種慢性病的早期被診斷和治療，這些慢性病每年造成70%的死亡，主要是因?yàn)槊绹?guó)人無(wú)法負(fù)擔(dān)治療（即使他們有保險(xiǎn)）。所以，這是生活質(zhì)量和壽命的問(wèn)題。而且，嬰兒死亡率更低，因?yàn)榕圆粫?huì)避免產(chǎn)前護(hù)理。而且，即使是有保險(xiǎn)的美國(guó)人，也更可能在等待手術(shù)時(shí)死去，因?yàn)榭磳＜倚枰?，看被推薦的外科醫(yī)生需要三周，安排手術(shù)又需要兩到三周，最少需要九周，假設(shè)你首先聯(lián)系專家。在加拿大，任何人等待心臟、腎臟、肝臟或腦部手術(shù)的時(shí)間都不會(huì)超過(guò)三到五周。
 
Mike Webster
Well there is of course a small matter of the fact that it doesn't have “a lower quality”. Indeed Canadians tend to live on average about 5 years longer than Americans and we have a far lower rate of infant mortality. Canadians are also more healthy than Americans in general.
 
當(dāng)然，實(shí)際上有一個(gè)小問(wèn)題，那就是它并沒(méi)有“更低的質(zhì)量”。事實(shí)上，加拿大人平均比美國(guó)人多活5年，且嬰兒死亡率要低得多。加拿大人總體健康狀況也比美國(guó)人好。
 
Fred Zlotnick
Because there are no insurance companies extracting profits from the system, more money is available for actual care. And because here in the US insurance companies have a financial incentive to deny care, many Americans don’t get the care they need until it’s too late. And because the threat of medical bankruptcy hangs over the uninsured and under-insured, people forgo essential care. All these reasons contribute to worse health outcomes for Americans than for Canadians, or citizens of France or the UK or Japan or New Zealand or Spain or… pick any industrialized country other than the US.
 
因?yàn)闆](méi)有保險(xiǎn)公司從系統(tǒng)中提取利潤(rùn)，所以更多的錢可以用于實(shí)際的護(hù)理。而且在美國(guó)，保險(xiǎn)公司有經(jīng)濟(jì)動(dòng)機(jī)拒絕治療，許多美國(guó)人在需要時(shí)得不到治療，直到為時(shí)已晚。由于醫(yī)療破產(chǎn)的威脅，許多沒(méi)有保險(xiǎn)和保險(xiǎn)不足的人會(huì)放棄必要的治療。所有這些原因?qū)е旅绹?guó)人的健康狀況比加拿大人、法國(guó)人、英國(guó)人、日本人、新西蘭人或西班牙人等其他工業(yè)化國(guó)家的公民更差。
 
Vincent Quinn
Canadian healthcare is funded through federal and provincial taxes. So we pay a little more in income and sales tax in exchange for universal coverage for everyone. It’s not free, we pay more for fuel, heating, alcohol, cigarettes, but if you get sick you get to keep your house, car, all your stuff. Somethings still cost out of pocket, drugs, dental, braces, wheelchairs, chiropractors,etc. But most people have employee health plans to help with the extras. We pay per person half of what the same care costs in the US. And we have better life expectancy, lower infant mortality, and better disease outcomes. You do have to wait for some things that aren’t urgent. If you have a true emergency things move just as fast as in the US. As a citizen of the largest economy in the world, how is this not a basic right?
 
加拿大的醫(yī)療保健是通過(guò)聯(lián)邦和省級(jí)稅收資助的。因此，我們?cè)谒枚惡弯N售稅方面支付略高一些，以換取全民覆蓋的醫(yī)療服務(wù)。這并不是免費(fèi)的，我們?cè)谌剂?、取暖、酒精、香煙等方面的花費(fèi)更高，但如果你生病了，你依然可以保住房子、車子和所有的財(cái)產(chǎn)。某些費(fèi)用仍然需要自付，比如藥物、牙科、牙套、輪椅、脊椎按摩等。但大多數(shù)人都有員工健康保險(xiǎn)來(lái)幫助支付這些額外費(fèi)用。我們每個(gè)人為醫(yī)療支付的費(fèi)用是美國(guó)的一半，而且我們有更高的預(yù)期壽命、更低的嬰兒死亡率和更好的疾病治療效果。如果你需要急診治療，速度和美國(guó)一樣快。作為全球最大經(jīng)濟(jì)體的公民，為什么這不是一項(xiàng)基本權(quán)利？
 
Carl Jacobson
Probably for the Basic Medical Care and Emergency Room visits, the Canadian Healthcare System is superior to the US Healthcare System - and you know you won’t go broke from wildly overinflated Medical and Insurance Bills and Pharmaceutical Costs.
Where the Canadian Healthcare System gets the majority of it’s criticism, is in the Long Wait Times for serious Surgeries and Appointments with Specialist Doctors.
That may be why many Canadians will also pay for a Private Medical Insurance Policy, which has faster Medical Service - OR they travel to the US for Surgeries.
 
對(duì)于基本醫(yī)療護(hù)理和急診就診，加拿大的醫(yī)療保健系統(tǒng)優(yōu)于美國(guó)醫(yī)療保健系統(tǒng)——而且你知道自己不會(huì)因?yàn)獒t(yī)療和保險(xiǎn)費(fèi)用的極高價(jià)格而破產(chǎn)。
加拿大醫(yī)療保健系統(tǒng)大部分的批評(píng)，主要集中在嚴(yán)重手術(shù)和看專科醫(yī)生的長(zhǎng)時(shí)間等待上。
這可能是為什么許多加拿大人也會(huì)支付私人醫(yī)療保險(xiǎn)，以獲得更快的醫(yī)療服務(wù)，或者他們會(huì)去美國(guó)做手術(shù)。
 
Karl D (aka Gonzo)
It is not free and not better in Canada
The cost is 100% tax-subsidized for the entire population for 70% of all medical products and services
Comprehensive healthcare can be 100% subsidized by tax revenue and 13.95% of earned income for people with high earned income
The high net worth may pay more than 13.95% of what they spend in a year, but people with that many resources in any country can do that if they desire.
 
在加拿大，并不免費(fèi)，也并不比美國(guó)更好。
成本完全由稅收資助，覆蓋整個(gè)大多數(shù)人口，70%的所有醫(yī)療產(chǎn)品和服務(wù)。
綜合醫(yī)療可以完全由稅收收入和高收入者的13.95%的所得稅來(lái)補(bǔ)貼。
高凈值人群可能支付超過(guò)13.95%的年支出，但任何國(guó)家的高資源人士如果愿意，也可以做到這一點(diǎn)。
 
Danielle
As A Canadian who lived in the USA from 2001 to 2010 I can tell you the quality is just as good. The biggest issue we have is that outside of the major cities, we have a shortage of doctors because doctors seem to prefer to live in the cities. The USA has this same problem. Hence wait times are longer for non-emergency procedures in the smaller communities or the people have to travel to the cities for more prompt treatment.
When this writer lived in California, with HMO level insurance I can tell you with the exception of Kaiser-Permanente, Canadian medical services are better. Not as good as PPO insurance but better than the HMO coverage most Americans have.
The exception was Kaiser-Permanente who is a little bit better than in Canada, at least in the big cities.
 
作為一名加拿大人，我在2001到2010年間住在美國(guó)，我可以告訴你，質(zhì)量是一樣好的。我們最大的問(wèn)題是，在主要城市以外，我們的醫(yī)生短缺，因?yàn)獒t(yī)生似乎更喜歡住在城市里。美國(guó)也面臨著同樣的問(wèn)題。因此，在較小社區(qū)，非緊急手術(shù)的等待時(shí)間較長(zhǎng)，或者人們必須前往城市才能更快地接受治療。
當(dāng)我在加利福尼亞州生活時(shí)，擁有HMO級(jí)別的保險(xiǎn)，我可以告訴你，除了Kaiser-Permanente，加拿大的醫(yī)療服務(wù)更好。雖然不如PPO保險(xiǎn)，但比美國(guó)大多數(shù)人擁有的HMO保險(xiǎn)要好。
唯一的例外是凱澤-永久性公司，它在加拿大的服務(wù)稍好，至少在大城市里是這樣的。
 
J V
Life experience, reading, and networking.May 18
It isn't free but costs half what the US system does. Who says it is low quality your right wing nut job news outlets that makes up its own reality and never uses facts.
In every single ranking I could located and there are many independent studies that have been done Canada always ranks higher quality than the US
So Canada has higher quality care, they have a longer lifespan that is increasing, and their system costs half what the US systems per person.

這不是免費(fèi)的，但它的費(fèi)用是美國(guó)系統(tǒng)的一半。誰(shuí)說(shuō)它質(zhì)量差？是那些右翼傻乎乎的新聞媒體，他們編造自己不真實(shí)的故事，從不使用事實(shí)。
在我找到的每一項(xiàng)排名中，且有很多獨(dú)立研究，表明加拿大的質(zhì)量總是比美國(guó)更高。
所以加拿大擁有更高質(zhì)量的護(hù)理，他們的預(yù)期壽命更長(zhǎng)，而且他們的系統(tǒng)每人花費(fèi)是美國(guó)系統(tǒng)的一半。
 
So why do you feel the US system is better it is the most expensive system in the world double off every other country. It ranaks last in all developed countries and even some third world countries have better quality.
Life spans are decreasing which means we are ding earlier and earlier most all other countries are living longer and longer.
So the US pays double, is going to die earlier, and has the worst care out of the most developed countries in the world.
So why does your right wing nut job news outlets provide you those facts?

那么，為什么你認(rèn)為美國(guó)的系統(tǒng)更好呢？它是世界上最貴的系統(tǒng)，每個(gè)人的花費(fèi)是其他任何國(guó)家的兩倍。它在所有發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家中排名最后，甚至一些第三世界國(guó)家的醫(yī)療質(zhì)量都比它好。
壽命在下降，這意味著我們死得越來(lái)越早，而幾乎所有其他國(guó)家的人都活得更久。
所以美國(guó)花費(fèi)了兩倍的錢，卻會(huì)死得更早，且在所有發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家中醫(yī)療質(zhì)量最差。
那為什么你的右翼傻乎乎的新聞媒體給你這些“事實(shí)”呢？
 
Jeanne Masten
Canada has a excellent health care program!! It beats the USA 100%! We are a extreme ignorant nation when it comes to health care!! The American people are fine with pharmaceutical companies lining the pockets of Congress and Senate,, screwing over us citizens every day!!! Money talks and Big Business Walks!!
 
加拿大有一個(gè)非常優(yōu)秀的醫(yī)療保健計(jì)劃?。∷让绹?guó)好100%！我們是一個(gè)極其無(wú)知的國(guó)家，尤其在醫(yī)療保健方面?。∶绹?guó)人民接受制藥公司填滿國(guó)會(huì)和參議院的口袋，每天都在坑害我們這些公民?。?！金錢說(shuō)話，大公司走路！
 
Pandu R. Arkeri
The Canadian health care is funded by taxes people pay. When a Canadian citizen or Permanent Resident receive service from doctors and hospitals the charges are billed to the Government.
Your statement about Canadian medical care is of a lower quality is far from the truth. Canada provide one of the best medical care to it’s people.
 
加拿大的醫(yī)療保健是通過(guò)人們支付的稅款來(lái)資助的。當(dāng)加拿大公民或永久居民接受醫(yī)生和醫(yī)院的服務(wù)時(shí)，費(fèi)用會(huì)由政府支付。
你關(guān)于加拿大醫(yī)療質(zhì)量較低的說(shuō)法完全不正確。加拿大為其人民提供的是世界上最好的醫(yī)療保健之一。